Conservative Patriots Group

The current argument requiring all providers of health care insurance to cover contraception misses a couple of significant points in my opinion. 1. Is pregnancy an illness against which the public should provide individuals with preventative care? 2. What constitutional authority have we the people given the federal government to regulate or provide healthcare. 3. Liberty to practice religion unhampered by government is a fundamental right, I can think of nothing more critical to that free practice than in issues of the sanctity of life.

I just asked some questions.

Upon reflection, your affiliation with the IBEW and continued membership in an organization (the Democratic Party) that is persecuting Christianity (promoting abortion and homosexuality) and deliberately raising gasoline prices is sufficient to render your actions questionable.

By the way, if you had not denounced my opposition to SB-39 (National Popular Vote Initiative via Interstate Compact) after my telephone address at the hearings in 2011 from the Anchorage LIO, you would not have appeared on my radar.

Grant W Hunter

hunterpp@gci.net

From: Sen. Bill Wielechowski [mailto:Senator_Bill_Wielechowski@legis.state.ak.us]

Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 10:08 AM

To: Grant Hunter

Subject: RE: Bill Wielechowski

Hi Grant,

If you Google my name, you will come up with 58,900 entries. My record is an open book.

My parents are in their 80’s, and unfortunately their health is not the best, so I really would find it disconcerting if they were harassed by you or anyone. But I did learn from them that you should never make veiled accusations of having “an affiliation with criminal persons, criminal groups” without some pretty solid proof. In fact there are laws against that sort of thing.

One of the things I like about Alaska is that most of us don’t judge others by where they went to school, what they do for a living or where they grew up. As a lawyer from Pennsylvania yourself, I find it odd you would make such insinuations.

Bill

Does anybody have any information about  the names of the parents of Bill Wielechowski?

I have googled for this information in the advanced search mode and found nothing.

Is he hiding an affiliation with criminal persons, criminal groups, leftist persons and/or leftist groups?

He is from New Jersey, attended Seton Hall and has an affiliation with the IBEW.

Do not these factors make him questionable?

Grant W Hunter

645 G Street Ste 100 PMB 653

Anchorage, AK 99501

Email: hunterpp@gci.net

Possible Corrupt Bargain by Lisa Murkowski?

I find it very interesting that, Arne Fuglvog, one of Lisa Murkowski’s aides, receives this deal shortly after Lisa attacks the Tea Party.

Is this deal part of a corrupt bargain?

Did Lisa or members of her family receive a portion of the illicit catch or, perhaps, a portion of the financial proceeds of the illicit catch?

Nothing would please me more than negtive answers to these questions.

Grant W Hunter

Tel: 9072586735

Email: hunterpp@gci.net

Blackberry: 9074447295

Blackberry email: mghunterpp@gci.blackberry.com

Our view: What?

Senator's explanation lame

Published: August 6th, 2011 08:14 PM

Last Modified: August 6th, 2011 08:14 PM

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, facing questions from news outfits around the state about fisheries aide Arne Fuglvog, decide to give some answers last week. Her answers only raised more questions.

Story tools

Font size : A | A | A

• Murkowski said that she learned from Karen Knutson, her then-chief of staff, in December 2010 or January 2011 that there were allegations against Fuglvog but that she took no action then because she didn't know "much more beyond that."

Why didn't she know more? A United States senator has a fisheries aide about whom there are federal allegations of fisheries violations. At the least, Murkowski should have had Fuglvog tell her exactly what the allegations were and ask him flat out what he had done. That wouldn't disrespect the legal process but the senator would find out if there were storm clouds gathering over her office.

You'd think a senator would make it crystal clear to every staff member that she would have to know about any criminal investigation of any of them, and any change in the status of those investigations. Even given the presumption of innocence, staffers often go on leave or suspension until a criminal matter is resolved. Murkowski's explanation that these things "can go on for years or turn out to be nothing at all" is stunning. Shrug off a federal criminal investigation of one of her staffers?

• Murkowski said Fuglvog didn't tell her he had a plea agreement in the works until June 29 and didn't say he had already signed it. She told him he would have to resign -- but then allowed him to stay on until the agreement was filed and made public.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here she cited the presumption of innocence. Huh? Presumption of innocence was irrelevant once Fuglvog agreed to a guilty plea. He told the senator that he was admitting guilt, admitting that he had committed a crime. Why would she keep him on the staff at that point? OK, the agreement hadn't been filed and the judge hadn't brought the gavel down yet. But practically speaking, Murkowski knew that Fuglvog was neither innocent nor effective -- hence the cancellation of a fishing-issues trip to Dillingham.

• Fuglvog signed that plea agreement on April 8, more than 2 1/2 months before the date Murkowski said she learned of it. Did anyone else on the staff know about that? If Murkowski didn't know about it, why not?

It's good Sen. Murkowski changed her mind about an explanation. But her account is at best a description of her own inadequacy and poor judgment in handling an issue of integrity.

Read more: http://www.adn.com/2011/08/06/2003672/our-view-what.html#ixzz1UU7sgr5K

Former Murkowski fisheries aide headed to prison

Jill Burke | Aug 02, 2011

Related

• Alaska fisheries dodge a bullet

• Alaska sues to block Aleutian fisheries ban

On Monday, the U.S. Attorney’s office in Anchorage charged Arne Fuglvog, fisheries aide to U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, with a single, misdemeanor violation of the Lacey Act, an act that combats “illegal” trafficking in wildlife, fish, and plants.

While working as a commercial fisherman in 2005, Fuglvog took 63,000 pounds of sablefish from an area near Yakutat, more than twice what his permits allowed, according to details provided in the plea deal Fuglvog signed, which was also made public on Monday. After overfishing, Fuglvog falsified reports to cover up the take, stating that the fish had instead been harvested from an area known as the “Central Gulf,’ according to prosecutors, adding that he then went on to sell the catch for about $100,000.

Fuglvog has known about the charges for at least several months. Although the plea deal was made public earlier this week, it’s signed and dated nearly five months ago, in April, and is referred to as a "negotiated resolution."

If a judge agrees to the terms of the plea deal, Fuglvog will spend 10 months in prison, pay a $50,000 fine and send another $100,000 – approximately the same amount he profited from the illegal fishing – to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation for enhancing fisheries in the coastal areas of the Gulf of Alaska.

He will also have to admit his wrongdoings in an announcement in National Fisherman Magazine.

Fuglvog’s legal woes also brought a swift end to his five-year career with Sen. Murkowski as a fisheries aide. One day before his crime was made public, he left his job.

"Prior to joining my staff, Arne Fuglvog violated a fishing regulation by misstating the location where he caught sablefish. I accepted his resignation Sunday, and he will plead guilty to this charge as part of a plea agreement,” Murkowski said via e-mail.

Fuglvog not only served under Murkowski, but spent many years before that in fisheries public service work, she said. "He knows the importance and value of our fisheries, and he also knows what all fishermen understand: fishing laws and regulations must be followed,” she said, adding that "Arne has cooperated fully with the authorities, taken responsibility for his actions, and accepted the consequences."

Fuglvog comes from a longtime fishing family in Petersburg and has spent at least three decades chasing salmon, crab, halibut and other species, according to a 2007 biography. He has years of experience advising and serving on the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council.

In 2009, he was an apparent finalist for the top spot at the National Marine Fisheries Service, according to the Alaska Journal of Commerce. The United Fisherman of Alaska endorsed Fuglvog for the spot and sent letters on his behalf during the candidate search. Fuglvog didn’t get the job.

Fuglvog is scheduled to be arraigned on the charge and enter a guilty plea next week.

Murkowski's office would not comment on how long the Senator had been aware of the investigation into Fuglvog's illegal fishing, and what response, if any, was taken or whether he had been taken off of fish policy issues. At the time his resignation was accepted, Fuglvog was still employed as a legislative assistant - the same generic job title he's held throughout most of his career with the Senator. Fuglvog earned $83,000 in 2009 and $91,000 in 2010 as part of Murkowski's staff, according to salary records.

Contact Jill Burke at jill(at)alaskadispatch.com

U.S. on Brink as ‘Absolutist’ Tea-Party Supporters Resist, Murkowski Says

Q

By Brian Wingfield and Katarzyna Klimasinska - Jul 29, 2011 8:00 PM GMT-0800

Enlarge image

Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska, speaks during an interview in Washington D.C., on Friday, July 29, 2011. Photo: Christopher Powers/Bloomberg

Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska, speaks during an interview in Washington D.C., on Friday, July 29, 2011. Photo: Christopher Powers/Bloomberg

Play Video

Q

July 28 (Bloomberg) -- The debt-ceiling proposals put forth by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio would each cut about $750 billion over the next 10 years, according to Bloomberg Government analyst Scott Anchin. To get to a ratio of 60 percent debt to GDP, $4.9 trillion in deficit reduction measures would be needed in the next 10 years, says Bloomberg Government analyst Christopher Payne. (Source: Bloomberg)

Attachment: Debt briefing

U.S. lawmakers allied with the “absolutist” Tea Party have put the nation on the financial brink with their aversion to compromise, Senator Lisa Murkowski said.

“I am really worried about where we are standing, and I think part of that has come about because you have individuals that say it is my ‘way or the highway,’” Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, said yesterday in an interview at Bloomberg’s Washington office. “That is not how you govern.”

House Republicans backed by the Tea Party have vowed to support an increase in the $14.3 trillion debt limit only if it’s accompanied by spending cuts and doesn’t raise taxes. President Barack Obama and Democrats propose a mix of tax increases and spending reductions.

“You have folks who are so black-and-white, who are so absolutist, that we are in a process now where we are on the brink,” said Murkowski, 54, who was defeated by a Tea Party supporter last year in a Republican primary and then re-elected as a write-in candidate.

The senator said she backs the proposal advanced by the Gang of Six, “or some iteration of it.” The bipartisan group of senators called the Gang of Six has proposed to cut the budget deficit by $3.7 trillion using a combination of spending cuts and an overhaul of taxes that would raise $1 trillion. Obama endorsed the plan, while House Republicans balked at the tax increases.

‘Damaging The Process’

“Those that believe that compromise is a dirty word, that believe that there is no place for compromise within their efforts, I think are damaging the process,” she said yesterday.

U.S. borrowing will exceed congressional authority on Aug. 2 unless Congress raises the debt ceiling, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said.

A short-term extension of borrowing authority may be the best option to prevent a U.S. default, giving lawmakers more time to wrestle with plans to cut the deficit, Murkowski said.

“I think that has to be our fallback position,” she said.

The Federal Reserve is preparing guidance for banks in the event the debt limit isn’t raised and the Treasury Department runs out of money to pay all of its bills, a government official said yesterday.

The guidance would cover issues including how payments on short-term loans are made, collateral pledged for loans as well as other supervisory and regulatory matters, said the official, who asked not to be identified because congressional negotiations on the debt limit are still under way.

Credit Rating

A credit-rating downgrade of U.S. Treasury securities caused by a failure to increase the borrowing authority would affect collateral pledged for loans.

Standard & Poor’s on July 14 said there’s a 50 percent chance the U.S. AAA rating would be cut from the highest grade within 90 days even if an agreement is reached by Aug. 2. S&P said it needs to see “a credible solution to the rising U.S. government debt burden.”

The Senate is unified to ensure the U.S. meets its debt obligations, according to Murkowski.

“I think we avoid the default,” she said. “I don’t know if we avoid the downgrade, and I’ve got real concerns about that.”

The debt and budget issues are “sucking the air out of the room” for other issues, Murkowski said. “And if in fact we go into a situation where it’s a short-term extension, my fear is that this will continue for the balance of the year,” resulting in very little new legislation.

To contact the reporters on this story: Brian Wingfield in Washington at bwingfield3@bloomberg.net; Katarzyna Klimasinska in Washington at kklimasinska@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Liebert at lliebert@bloomberg.net

Lets start identifying who we want out of the congress

including Don Young, and after we do that we should

start emailing all tea party members throught out the

country, start bringing out their faults.

Start promoting term limits and a balanced budget

Law.

They will not keep their word.

Commonwealth North is happy to host Senator Lisa Murkowski Tuesday, August 23 from 12-1 at the Dena'ina Center in Anchorage. Our senior Senator will be addressing the major issues facing Alaska in Washington.

As many of us as possible need to show up to question our senior senator about the contempt she has shown to the Tea Party desire to save the United States from financial ruin. The price of admission per person is $30.00.

Grant W Hunter

907-258-6735/907-444-7295

hunterpp@gci.net

Memorial of Grant W. Hunter to Lisa Murkowski with Regard to Certain Remarks about the Tea Party Contingent of the Republican Party in Compliance with the Obligation Imposed by the Provisions of Ezekiel 3: 16-19

Senator Murkowski:

Public Debt

I read with extreme concern your attack on the Tea-Party faction for over-emphasis on the public debt crisis. The United States Treasury is borrowing forty cents out of every dollar spent; this cannot continue. It must stop now. Any increase in taxes would be the equivalent of giving liquor to an alcoholic. The bond rating will most certainly go down whether or not the debt ceiling is raised; however, it is my understanding that credit worthiness is inversely proportional to the debt size (absolute or relative). Consequently, holding the debt ceiling down is probably the wiser course.

At this juncture, how can anything, with the exception of military-terroristic threats, be more important than getting the public debt under control?

Observation on Your Character and on Your Conduct

Analogical Observation

You would have made an excellent sister of Alpha Delta Epsilon during my time at Dickinson College. Alpha Delta Epsilon, which discontinued some years ago, was a fine collection of liars, hypocrites and snobs. With all due respect, I must regrettably conclude that you are a bad senator, a snooty brat, a bad daughter and a bad godmother.

Bad Senator

Why have you not established a coalition of Senators from the Western States to link any change in the debt ceiling to a more open policy on natural resource development and the surrender of the BLM lands to the states in which they are located? If the debt ceiling is that important to the Kenyan and his supporters, they will cave.

Snooty Brat

Why did you make fun of Joe Miller and his wife for being poor during the election of 2010? You were the rich kid making fun of the poor kid.

Bad Daughter

Your father stressed the threat of a continued increase in the public debt on numerous occasions when the debt was considerably lower. As a filial daughter, how can you regard anything, with the exception of military-terroristic threats, to be more important than getting the public debt under control?

Bad Godmother

Holy Family Cathedral Oration

Recall your Holy Family Cathedral oration at the memorial for the sainted Carol Treadwell in which you set the foundation to be appointed by your father to the United States Senate once he became governor of Alaska in place of obviously more qualified and intelligent persons such as Mead Treadwell, a genuine patrician, or Sarah Palin, a true daughter of the people. With reference to Mead, I must say that using a friend’s memorial to help yourself to something that should have gone to her widower does indicate a high level of self-centered neurological energy.

Status Before Oration

Please recall that, prior to that oration, you were simply the daughter of a man who held a seat in the United States Senate and a bunch of shares in area banks. In that context, I seem to recall something unfortunate in the matter of Bank of the North. Hopefully, such misfortune will not be replicated for the United States as a consequence of your actions.

Contents of Oration

I can still recall you exhorting those present to join you in promising to look after her children. The course of action that you are advocating now, Obama’s desired increases in the public debt coupled with tax increases–more liquor for the drunk, does appear to be in conflict that promise by seeking higher levels of debt and taxation to supply resources to elements who deprive your sainted friend’s children of liberty, property and, more likely than not, life. In the contemporary context, you would seem to be looking after those children in the way that the butcher looks after cattle as you prepare to offer their lives on an alter of sacrifice to the sinful (stealing and coveting) wills of such as the Kenyan Jackal Obama and Richard Trumpka.

Possible Thoughts of Carol Treadwell as She Looks Down from Heaven on Your Bad Ways

As she looks down from Heaven, what does Carol think of your conduct? In light of her well-known devotion to the Holy Apostolic Faith, is she concerned that your conduct will facilitate sinful forces embodied in the likes of Obama, Trumpka and their minions that will result in serious, if not mortal, harm to those children? Although her faith tells her that those children would join her in Heaven, is she concerned that, when Obama and his minions decide that you have outlived your usefulness, you will be lucky to escape with a prolonged period under the supervision of Cato the Younger in Purgatory unless you turn away from your bad ways?

Conclusion

Some might think it presumptuous that I submit this address to you; however, the Word of Lord as set out in Ezekiel 3: 16-19 tells us the following:

3:16 And it came to pass at the end of seven days, that the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

3:17 Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.

3:18 When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

3:19 Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

Please turn away from following the evil path of Obama. Remember the following set out in Ezekiel 3: 21:

3:21 Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he is warned; also thou hast delivered thy soul.

I respectfully submit that this could best be accomplished by resigning your seat in the United States Senate and campaigning for Mead Treadwell, Sarah Palin or Joe Miller to replace you or by converting to the principles of the Tea Party.

Why is Lesil McGuire, a Republican, a cosponsor of this bill?

I have the following questions:

Has Hollis French taken some form of advantage of her? I want an investigation.

Has she been given some special favor with respect to her son’s father in exchange for subverting the Constitution of the United States?

Did leftist elements from the Lower Forty-Eight threaten harm to her son's father while he is incarcerated? Violence, threats and lies are the way of the left.

Didn’t I hear something about her son’s father going to the halfway house sooner than would normally have been expected?

Is she a leftist infiltrator into the Republican Party as Julius and Ethel Rosenberg infiltrated our nuclear program during World War II?

Has she received some form of financial consideration to betray Alaska?

Is she simply the object of some form of coercion as the result of an unfortunate episode involving alcohol and/or other substances?

Does she have some hatred for Blacks and/or Jews?

Nothing would please me more than to have all of the above questions be answered in the negative.

I do not know the answers to these questions; however, I think there needs to be a thorough investigation of Lesil McGuire, her communications and her financial records along with those of her family in order to get at the truth of the matter.

The same action should be taken with respect to Hollis French in order to eliminate him as a suspected source of improper influence , if any, upon Lesil McGuire.

Would not a vote for this measure then be a constructive participation after the fact in some form of bribery, some form of ethnic hatred or in some form of extortion if even one of the questions set out above is answered in the affirmative?

Oppose SB 39.

Grant W Hunter

645 G Street Ste100 PMB 653

Anchorage, AK 99501

907.258.6735

907.444.7295

hunterpp@gci.net

The Situation

As you already may know, Lesil McGuire is cosponsoring the plot of State Senator Hollis French now embodied in the bill known as SB 39 to stab Alaska in the back by giving power over Alaska’s votes in the Electoral College to persons who are not entitled to vote in elections held in Alaska.

Why You Should Oppose SB 39

The votes of the street trash of the inner cities of the Lower-Eight, the thugs of Chicago, the leftists, homosexuals and Green Peace members of San Francisco, the actors of Hollywood and other assorted constituencies of the Democratic Party in the Lower Forty-Eight have no place in determining how Alaska casts her votes in Presidential elections. I have no problem with Alaska homosexuals and/or Alaska Green Peace members voting in Alaska elections.

Such a decision is to be made by a vote of the people in Alaska in each separate Presidential election subject to the electoral procedures provided by law in Alaska. The legislature has no business giving away by interstate compact the votes of future Alaskan electorates in future Alaskan elections especially since Alaska has consistently voted Republican in Presidential elections.

The Republican Party supports states rights, natural resources development, a strong defense and the Second Amendment. Awarding the electoral votes in the manner proposed by Senator French would result in Alaska voting for the Democratic Party in the Electoral College when her people had voted for the Republican Party.

The person with a majority of votes in the Electoral College or, failing such a majority, a majority of the delegations of the Several States in the House of Representatives should be President as provide by Article II and Amendment 12 of the United States Constitution until such time as an Amendment is enacted in accordance with Article V of the United States Constitution.

In any event, a national popular election would result in the political castration of Jews and Blacks in the United States because it would be possible to craft a majority based on Whites, Asians and Hispanics. We would face the possibility of future Presidents being elected with an active hostility toward Jews and Blacks. By the way, such a person would probably come from the Left as did Adolph Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Obama and Pol Pot. The current White House apparently thinks well of these parties. President Obama has spoken with pride of his associations with Marxists.

The current administration has already shown such attitudes toward Jews and toward Israel. One could easily imagine a future President being elected on a promise to cut government expenditures on behalf of or even to harm the Black community in order to gain favor with Whites, Asians and Hispanics. Once the Black vote is no longer needed to get the electoral votes in key states, who can say? Kindly remember that the Jewish community in Germany was highly assimilated and patriotic. Walter Rathenau was an enthusiastic advocate of military revival. Otto Frank was a combat veteran of World War I.

The supporters of this measure may very well be a combination of the butcher and the Judas goat when it comes to the political, if not the physical, existence of Black people in the United States.

With regard to the benefits of the Electoral College, please consult Ms. Tara Ross’ ENLIGHTENED DEMOCRACY: THE CASE FOR THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE (2004). In particular, examine pp. 201-203 for her conclusion if you are too busy to read the whole book before voting to sell Alaska down the river. The reference to selling Alaska down to the river is of course directed at the Democrats. Ms. Ross’ book is available online from Barnes & Noble. Just skip one night on the town to better inform yourself to defend freedom.

Oppose SB 39.

Why is Lesil McGuire a cosponsor of this bill?

I have the following questions:

Has Hollis French taken some form of advantage of her by virtue of his charm and/or intellect? I want an investigation.

Has she been given some special favor with respect to her son’s father in exchange for subverting the Constitution of the United States?

Did leftist elements from the Lower Forty-Eight threaten harm to her son's father while he is incarcerated?

Didn’t I hear something about her son’s father going to the halfway house sooner than would normally have been expected?

Is she a leftist infiltrator into the Republican Party as Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were infiltrators into our nuclear program during World War II? 

Has she received some form of financial consideration to betray Alaska?

Is she simply the object of some form of coercion by elements from the Lower Forty-Eight  as the result of an unfortunate episode involving alcohol and/or other substances?

Does she have some hatred for Blacks and/or Jews?

Nothing would please me more than to have all of the above questions be answered in the negative.

I do not know the answers to these questions; however, I think there needs to be a thorough investigation of Lesil McGuire, her communications and her financial records along with those of her family in order to get at the truth of the matter.

The same action should be taken with respect to Hollis French in order to eliminate him as a suspected source of improper influence, if any, upon Lesil McGuire.

Oppose SB 39.

Grant W Hunter

645 G Street Ste100 PMB 653

Anchorage, AK 99501

907.258.6735

907.444.7295

hunterpp@gci.net

Lesil McGuire’s Possible Motivation for Participation in Hollis French’s Plot to Steal Alaskan Voting Rights and/or Politically Castrate the Vote of Jews and Blacks in U. S. Presidential Elections?

I have the following questions:

Has Hollis French taken some form of advantage of her? I want an investigation.

 Has she been given some special favor with respect to her son’s father in exchange for subverting the Constitution of the United States?

Didn’t I hear something about her son’s father going to the halfway house sooner than would normally have been expected? 

 Has she received some form of financial consideration to betray Alaska?

 Is she simply the object of some form of coercion as the result of an unfortunate episode involving alcohol and/or other substances?

  Does she have some hatred for Blacks and/or Jews?

Nothing would please me more than to have all of the above questions be answered in the negative.

I do not know the answers to these questions; however, I  think there needs to be a thorough investigation of Lesil McGuire, her communications and her financial records along with those of her family in order to get at the truth of the matter. The same action should be taken with respect to Hollis French.